Pupil Premium allocation for 2014 / 2015
In 2014 / 2015 we received £136,300 which represents £1300 for each E6 pupil and £1900 for LAC pupils. Of this money £143,549 was spent (overspend of +£7,249). This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2014 / 2015 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen summarised below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School. The link above also evidences what the money was spent on resulting in increased progress and attainment.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y2 44.8% 48.3% 44.4%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y1) to summer 2015 (the end of Y2)
From the end of Y1, the table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading (-0.6) and more in writing (+0.3) and maths (+0.1) than their non-FSM peers. In all areas this is better than the previous year with the gap closing by 0.1 in reading, and FSM being higher in writing and maths (when they were lower in 2014 / 2014).
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
4.2 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y6 41.2% 46.2% 48.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y5) to summer 2015 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers. Both groups of children exceeded national expectations in terms of progress (expected is 3.0).
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
Reading 4.4 |
Writing 5.6 |
Maths 5.1 |
Reading 3.5 |
Writing 5.0 |
Maths 4.8 |