Greenfield Primary School
Pupil Premium 2013 - 2014
Pupil Premium allocation for 2013 / 2014 and details of how we spent our allocation
This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2013 / 2014 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen in a summarised form below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y2 43.3% 44.8% 48.3%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y1) to summer 2014 (the end of Y2)
The table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.1 |
Writing 2.6 |
Maths 3.8 |
Reading 4.7 |
Writing 3.6 |
Maths 4.2 |
- Our 2014 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 14.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.6 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved on average -0.6 below national.
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.1 compared to a national average of 16.4 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are -2.1 below our non-FSM compared with a national difference of -1.8.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y6 34.4% 41.2% 46.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y5) to summer 2014 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 5.1 |
Writing 7.0 |
Maths 7.1 |
Reading 4.6 |
Writing 6.0 |
Maths 5.6 |
- Our 2014 KS1 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 29.2 for FSM pupils compared to 27.0 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved 2.2 higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.3 compared to 29.4 nationally. This is a difference of -0.1.
The closing of these gaps shows that the school is using the funding effectively. We continue to strive to close the gap further by continuing to offer smaller class sizes through additional adults as it has proven to have a positive impact on attainment of all groups of children.
Greenfield Primary School
Pupil Premium 2013 - 2014
Pupil Premium allocation for 2013 / 2014 and details of how we spent our allocation
This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2013 / 2014 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen in a summarised form below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y2 43.3% 44.8% 48.3%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y1) to summer 2014 (the end of Y2)
The table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.1 |
Writing 2.6 |
Maths 3.8 |
Reading 4.7 |
Writing 3.6 |
Maths 4.2 |
- Our 2014 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 14.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.6 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved on average -0.6 below national.
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.1 compared to a national average of 16.4 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are -2.1 below our non-FSM compared with a national difference of -1.8.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y6 34.4% 41.2% 46.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y5) to summer 2014 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 5.1 |
Writing 7.0 |
Maths 7.1 |
Reading 4.6 |
Writing 6.0 |
Maths 5.6 |
- Our 2014 KS1 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 29.2 for FSM pupils compared to 27.0 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved 2.2 higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.3 compared to 29.4 nationally. This is a difference of -0.1.
The closing of these gaps shows that the school is using the funding effectively. We continue to strive to close the gap further by continuing to offer smaller class sizes through additional adults as it has proven to have a positive impact on attainment of all groups of children.
Greenfield Primary School
Pupil Premium 2013 - 2014
Pupil Premium allocation for 2013 / 2014 and details of how we spent our allocation
This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2013 / 2014 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen in a summarised form below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y2 43.3% 44.8% 48.3%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y1) to summer 2014 (the end of Y2)
The table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.1 |
Writing 2.6 |
Maths 3.8 |
Reading 4.7 |
Writing 3.6 |
Maths 4.2 |
- Our 2014 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 14.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.6 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved on average -0.6 below national.
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.1 compared to a national average of 16.4 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are -2.1 below our non-FSM compared with a national difference of -1.8.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y6 34.4% 41.2% 46.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y5) to summer 2014 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 5.1 |
Writing 7.0 |
Maths 7.1 |
Reading 4.6 |
Writing 6.0 |
Maths 5.6 |
- Our 2014 KS1 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 29.2 for FSM pupils compared to 27.0 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved 2.2 higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.3 compared to 29.4 nationally. This is a difference of -0.1.
The closing of these gaps shows that the school is using the funding effectively. We continue to strive to close the gap further by continuing to offer smaller class sizes through additional adults as it has proven to have a positive impact on attainment of all groups of children.