Greenfield Primary School
Pupil Premium Archive
Pupil Premium allocation for 2015 / 2016
In 2015 / 2016 we received £139,900.
Details of how the funding has been spent can be viewed by clicking on this link.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen summarised below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School. The link above also evidences what the money was spent on resulting in increased progress and attainment.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2014 2015 2016
School 44% 41.4% 41.8%
National 26.6% 26.0% 25.2%
School Y2 48.3% 44.4% 31%
|
KS1 2015 / 2016 attainment |
||||
|
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Nationally) |
Pupils not eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
|
|
% achieving in reading, writing and maths (% school / __% national) |
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in reading |
55% |
62% |
72% |
78% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in reading |
25% |
13% |
21% |
27% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in writing |
50% |
53% |
60% |
70% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in writing |
0% 7% 10% 15% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in maths |
60% |
60% |
62% |
77% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in maths |
5% |
10% |
17% |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2014 2015 2016
School 44% 41.4% 41.8%
National 26.6% 26.0% 25.2%
School Y6 46.2% 48.2% 36%
|
KS2 2015 / 2016 attainment |
||||
|
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Nationally) |
Pupils not eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
|
|
% achieving in reading, writing and maths (50% school / 53% national) |
44% |
39% |
55% |
60% |
|
% achieving EXS in reading |
63% |
53% |
64% |
71% |
|
% achieving Above / High in reading |
19% |
10% |
9% |
23% |
|
Scaled score in reading |
101.8 |
99.9 |
101.9 |
103.8 |
|
KS2 % making progress in reading |
0.05 |
-0.72 |
2.02 |
0.33 |
|
% achieving EXS in writing |
81% |
64% |
73% |
79% |
|
% achieving Above / High in writing |
25% |
8% |
23% |
18% |
|
Scaled score in writing |
N/A |
|||
|
KS2 % making progress in writing |
2.82
|
-0.26 |
3.19 |
0.12
|
|
% achieving EXS in maths |
56% |
57% |
77% |
75% |
|
% achieving Above / High in maths |
0% |
9% |
0% |
20% |
|
Scaled score in maths |
100.8 |
100.7 |
101.4 |
104.1 |
|
KS2 % making progress in maths |
-1.62 |
-0.52 |
0.90 |
0.24 |
Pupil Premium allocation for 2014 / 2015
In 2014 / 2015 we received £136,300 which represents £1300 for each E6 pupil and £1900 for LAC pupils. Of this money £143,549 was spent (overspend of +£7,249). This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2014 / 2015 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen summarised below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School. The link above also evidences what the money was spent on resulting in increased progress and attainment.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y2 44.8% 48.3% 44.4%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y1) to summer 2015 (the end of Y2)
From the end of Y1, the table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading (-0.6) and more in writing (+0.3) and maths (+0.1) than their non-FSM peers. In all areas this is better than the previous year with the gap closing by 0.1 in reading, and FSM being higher in writing and maths (when they were lower in 2014 / 2014).
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
|
4.2 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Our 2015 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 13.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.8 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved below national. Although the attainment of our FSM pupils is below national ,their progress from the end of Y1 to the end of Y2 was strong (as the table above identifies - expected progress is 3.0 in a year).
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.3 compared to a national average of 16.6 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are 13.0 and our non-FSM are 16.3 giving a difference of 3.3 compared with a national difference of 1.8 - this is higher than 2014 data.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y6 41.2% 46.2% 48.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y5) to summer 2015 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers. Both groups of children exceeded national expectations in terms of progress (expected is 3.0).
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.4 |
Writing 5.6 |
Maths 5.1 |
Reading 3.5 |
Writing 5.0 |
Maths 4.8 |
- Our 2015 KS2 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 28.1 for FSM pupils compared to 27.2 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.1 compared to 29.5 nationally. This shows our non-FSM were -0.4 below national non-FSM.
Pupil Premium allocation for 2013 / 2014 and details of how we spent our allocation
This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2013 / 2014 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen in a summarised form below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y2 43.3% 44.8% 48.3%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y1) to summer 2014 (the end of Y2)
The table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.1 |
Writing 2.6 |
Maths 3.8 |
Reading 4.7 |
Writing 3.6 |
Maths 4.2 |
- Our 2014 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 14.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.6 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved on average -0.6 below national.
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.1 compared to a national average of 16.4 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are -2.1 below our non-FSM compared with a national difference of -1.8.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y6 34.4% 41.2% 46.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y5) to summer 2014 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 5.1 |
Writing 7.0 |
Maths 7.1 |
Reading 4.6 |
Writing 6.0 |
Maths 5.6 |
- Our 2014 KS1 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 29.2 for FSM pupils compared to 27.0 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved 2.2 higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.3 compared to 29.4 nationally. This is a difference of -0.1.
The closing of these gaps shows that the school is using the funding effectively. We continue to strive to close the gap further by continuing to offer smaller class sizes through additional adults as it has proven to have a positive impact on attainment of all groups of children.
Greenfield Primary School
Pupil Premium Archive
Pupil Premium allocation for 2015 / 2016
In 2015 / 2016 we received £139,900.
Details of how the funding has been spent can be viewed by clicking on this link.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen summarised below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School. The link above also evidences what the money was spent on resulting in increased progress and attainment.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2014 2015 2016
School 44% 41.4% 41.8%
National 26.6% 26.0% 25.2%
School Y2 48.3% 44.4% 31%
|
KS1 2015 / 2016 attainment |
||||
|
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Nationally) |
Pupils not eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
|
|
% achieving in reading, writing and maths (% school / __% national) |
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in reading |
55% |
62% |
72% |
78% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in reading |
25% |
13% |
21% |
27% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in writing |
50% |
53% |
60% |
70% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in writing |
0% 7% 10% 15% |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% achieving EXS in maths |
60% |
60% |
62% |
77% |
|
% achieving Greater Depth in maths |
5% |
10% |
17% |
20% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2014 2015 2016
School 44% 41.4% 41.8%
National 26.6% 26.0% 25.2%
School Y6 46.2% 48.2% 36%
|
KS2 2015 / 2016 attainment |
||||
|
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils eligible for PP (Nationally) |
Pupils not eligible for PP (Greenfield)
|
Pupils not eligible for PP (national average)
|
|
% achieving in reading, writing and maths (50% school / 53% national) |
44% |
39% |
55% |
60% |
|
% achieving EXS in reading |
63% |
53% |
64% |
71% |
|
% achieving Above / High in reading |
19% |
10% |
9% |
23% |
|
Scaled score in reading |
101.8 |
99.9 |
101.9 |
103.8 |
|
KS2 % making progress in reading |
0.05 |
-0.72 |
2.02 |
0.33 |
|
% achieving EXS in writing |
81% |
64% |
73% |
79% |
|
% achieving Above / High in writing |
25% |
8% |
23% |
18% |
|
Scaled score in writing |
N/A |
|||
|
KS2 % making progress in writing |
2.82
|
-0.26 |
3.19 |
0.12
|
|
% achieving EXS in maths |
56% |
57% |
77% |
75% |
|
% achieving Above / High in maths |
0% |
9% |
0% |
20% |
|
Scaled score in maths |
100.8 |
100.7 |
101.4 |
104.1 |
|
KS2 % making progress in maths |
-1.62 |
-0.52 |
0.90 |
0.24 |
Pupil Premium allocation for 2014 / 2015
In 2014 / 2015 we received £136,300 which represents £1300 for each E6 pupil and £1900 for LAC pupils. Of this money £143,549 was spent (overspend of +£7,249). This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2014 / 2015 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen summarised below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School. The link above also evidences what the money was spent on resulting in increased progress and attainment.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y2 44.8% 48.3% 44.4%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y1) to summer 2015 (the end of Y2)
From the end of Y1, the table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading (-0.6) and more in writing (+0.3) and maths (+0.1) than their non-FSM peers. In all areas this is better than the previous year with the gap closing by 0.1 in reading, and FSM being higher in writing and maths (when they were lower in 2014 / 2014).
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
Reading |
Writing |
Maths |
|
4.2 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
3.3 |
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Our 2015 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 13.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.8 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved below national. Although the attainment of our FSM pupils is below national ,their progress from the end of Y1 to the end of Y2 was strong (as the table above identifies - expected progress is 3.0 in a year).
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.3 compared to a national average of 16.6 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are 13.0 and our non-FSM are 16.3 giving a difference of 3.3 compared with a national difference of 1.8 - this is higher than 2014 data.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2013 2014 2015
School 42.9% 44% 41.4%
National 26.7% 26.6% 26.0%
School Y6 41.2% 46.2% 48.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2014 (the end of Y5) to summer 2015 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers. Both groups of children exceeded national expectations in terms of progress (expected is 3.0).
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.4 |
Writing 5.6 |
Maths 5.1 |
Reading 3.5 |
Writing 5.0 |
Maths 4.8 |
- Our 2015 KS2 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 28.1 for FSM pupils compared to 27.2 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.1 compared to 29.5 nationally. This shows our non-FSM were -0.4 below national non-FSM.
Pupil Premium allocation for 2013 / 2014 and details of how we spent our allocation
This link shows a table of what the money has been spent on in the 2013 / 2014 academic year.
How did pupil premium funding make a difference to the attainment of disadvantaged pupils?
Evidence of the impact of this support through assessment data can be seen in a summarised form below. We have an in-depth tracking system which is analysed half termly enabling the SLT and class teachers to monitor and act on the progress of a range of different groups throughout their time at Greenfield Primary School.
KS1
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y2 43.3% 44.8% 48.3%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y1) to summer 2014 (the end of Y2)
The table shows that in Y2 FSM pupils made less progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 4.1 |
Writing 2.6 |
Maths 3.8 |
Reading 4.7 |
Writing 3.6 |
Maths 4.2 |
- Our 2014 KS1 average point score (APS) data across reading, writing and maths was 14.0 for FSM pupils compared to 14.6 nationally meaning that our FSM pupils achieved on average -0.6 below national.
- Our non-FSM pupils APS was 16.1 compared to a national average of 16.4 highlighting a much smaller gap between non-FSM and national than there is with FSM and national.
- Our FSM pupils are -2.1 below our non-FSM compared with a national difference of -1.8.
KS2
Percentage of pupils eligible for FSM
2012 2013 2014
School 41.7% 42.9% 44%
National 26.2% 26.7% 26.6%
School Y6 34.4% 41.2% 46.2%
The table below shows APS from summer 2013 (the end of Y5) to summer 2014 (the end of Y6)
The table shows that in Y6 FSM pupils made more progress in reading, writing and maths than their non-FSM peers.
|
FSM |
Non-FSM |
||||
|
Reading 5.1 |
Writing 7.0 |
Maths 7.1 |
Reading 4.6 |
Writing 6.0 |
Maths 5.6 |
- Our 2014 KS1 APS data across reading, writing and maths was 29.2 for FSM pupils compared to 27.0 nationally. This shows our FSM pupils to have achieved 2.2 higher APS than national.
- Our non-FSM APS was 29.3 compared to 29.4 nationally. This is a difference of -0.1.
The closing of these gaps shows that the school is using the funding effectively. We continue to strive to close the gap further by continuing to offer smaller class sizes through additional adults as it has proven to have a positive impact on attainment of all groups of children.